<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Information Contraband &#187; Thought</title>
	<atom:link href="http://informationcontraband.com/category/thought/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://informationcontraband.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 15:54:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Reality</title>
		<link>http://informationcontraband.com/thought/486</link>
		<comments>http://informationcontraband.com/thought/486#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 18:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Thought]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://informationcontraband.com/?p=486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Independent has a sort-of interesting article about PR firms altering Wikipedia entries. Does that surprise anyone? Almost all of what we &#8220;know&#8221; in daily life is a consensus agreement between gatekeepers of one sort or another. I don&#8217;t necessarily have a problem with that. Much as I&#8217;d like to, I am not able to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Independent has <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/mystery-of-the-wikifixer-who-is-the-secret-imagecleansing-agent-2295497.html" target="_blank">a sort-of interesting article</a> about PR firms altering Wikipedia entries. Does that surprise anyone?</p>
<p>Almost all of what we &#8220;know&#8221; in daily life is a consensus agreement between gatekeepers of one sort or another. I don&#8217;t necessarily have a problem with that. Much as I&#8217;d like to, I am not able to empirically verify all of the information I depend upon; I don&#8217;t have the math chops for physics or the memory for biology, so I rely on trusted sources to tell me the truth. If I doubt the information they&#8217;re giving me, I can dig in and research/test that information. Same with Wikipedia. <em>Trust, but verify</em> and <em>don&#8217;t believe everything you think</em> and <em>be open to the possibility that your sources are wrong</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://informationcontraband.com/thought/486/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Retouching is the Right Thing to Do</title>
		<link>http://informationcontraband.com/art/photography/retouching-is-the-right-thing-to-do</link>
		<comments>http://informationcontraband.com/art/photography/retouching-is-the-right-thing-to-do#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 20:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retouching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thought]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://informationcontraband.com/?p=421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting take on the ethics of retouching.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.lbecker.com/blog/?p=99" target="_blank">Interesting take</a> on the ethics of retouching.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://informationcontraband.com/art/photography/retouching-is-the-right-thing-to-do/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blogs are Yucky</title>
		<link>http://informationcontraband.com/miscellaneous/blogs-are-yucky</link>
		<comments>http://informationcontraband.com/miscellaneous/blogs-are-yucky#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 15:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Amusing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thought]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social commentary]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://informationcontraband.com/?p=280</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;I hate blogs. I even hate the word blog. It&#8217;s ugly in print and it&#8217;s ugly rolling off the tongue. And, as a class, the content in them is just as bad. Simplistic, repetitive, puerile, self-indulgent twaddle that nine times out of 10 I&#8217;m almost embarrassed to look at (and I avoid looking as much [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I hate blogs. I even hate the word blog. It&#8217;s ugly in print and it&#8217;s ugly rolling off the tongue. And, as a class, the content in them is just as bad. Simplistic, repetitive, puerile, self-indulgent twaddle that nine times out of 10 I&#8217;m almost embarrassed to look at (and I avoid looking as much as possible). A serious waste of bandwidth and a club with which I do not wish to be associated, thank you very much.&#8221;  —<a title="ctein" href="http://ctein.com" target="_blank">Ctein</a> in the comments at <a title="top" href="http://theonlinephotographer.typepad.com/the_online_photographer/2009/03/ot-site-notes.html#more" target="_blank">theonlinephotographer.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://informationcontraband.com/miscellaneous/blogs-are-yucky/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Roger Ebert Finally Reviews &#8220;Expelled&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://informationcontraband.com/science/roger-ebert-finally-reviews-expelled</link>
		<comments>http://informationcontraband.com/science/roger-ebert-finally-reviews-expelled#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 17:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thought]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ben Stein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Darwin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[idiots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intelligent Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://informationcontraband.com/?p=164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[and it&#8217;s the best-written review I&#8217;ve read all year.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="/"></a>and it&#8217;s the <a title="expelled" href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2008/12/win_ben_steins_mind.html" target="_blank">best-written review</a> I&#8217;ve read all year.
<p><a href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/darwinape.jpg"><img alt="" src="http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/darwinape.jpg" title="darwin-ape" class="alignnone" width="400" height="507" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://informationcontraband.com/science/roger-ebert-finally-reviews-expelled/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

